That might work. In my mind primary key is not a database-centric term. Maybe uniqueKey is better.
Votes? Im +0 -Igor > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Christian Essl > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 6:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] DataView: IDataProvider.primaryKey() vote > > Maybe uniqueKey()? > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:34:33 -0700, Igor Vaynberg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> > >> I think people are getting turned off by it being called > >> primaryKey() because that makes it sound like all you can > work from > >> are databases. > > > > What shoud we call it? > > > > -Igor > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - > Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development > Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * > Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * > http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
