Good idea.

Eelco

Dan Gould wrote:

I've shown wicket to a few folks and they're all confused by this.

I think people could get up to speed far faster if the error message
included comments to the effect:

 ''This means that you declared wicket:id="foo" in your markup but never
  bound "foo" to a model in your code.''

or

 ''This means that you bound "foo" to a model in your code, but the
  markup never declares wicket:id="foo".''

It's kind of simple and dumb, but I love systems that include friendly
error messages that follow the formal, detailed ones.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to