Gwyn Evans wrote:
On 02/09/05, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Developers
need to extend (hard link) Wicket objects and as such are binding into its
license.
I'm afraid I view *that* particular assertion as ASF-sourced FUD, as
to my reading of it, the LGPL certainly does not force that. See
section 6, particularly 6b (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html)
I think you misunderstood me here.
I'm *not* talking about an obliged requirement from LGPL or something to extend
Wicket objects. That would be nonsense.
But you just can't create a Wicket application without a hard link to Wicket.
You need at least to extend WebApplication and one or more WebPages.
That's no FUD, that's a fact.
/Gwyn
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
