Those classes are declared as 'package' rather than 'public' and by
default, JavaDoc's only generated for public & protected elements.  We
had a bit of a discussion, though, and changed the project properties
such that they too should have generated docs from the next release.

/Gwyn

On 07/09/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems quite odd to me that a few of Wicket's classes don't show up in
> the Javadoc.  I haven't done any investigating into why; I don't really
> even know how to go about that.  But if anyone has some ideas, it would
> be worth at least knowing the reason.
> 
> The classes that I've noticed are all in wicket.markup.html.form:
> 
>      AbstractChoice
>      AbstractSingleSelectChoice
>      AbstractTextComponenet
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
>    -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to