good question. I currently don't see any reason why we should change it. But you never know. At least I'm not aware of any change which will affect it.
Juergen On 9/13/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just noticed that I'm now able to build the component tree on a page > AFTER checkAccess() instead of only in the constructor. This seems > great because I don't have to worry about state that's enforced in > checkAccess(). Is this intentional? Is this behavior going to remain > through future versions? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
