haha, I should have just asked. I've been using my own non-final
FileResourceStream for months now. :D
On 9/13/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made it non-final.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 9/13/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a good reason to have FileResourceStream final? I may be
> > missing a better way to use it, but I feel I'm jumping through some
> > serious hoops because I want to override one method of this class. What
> > I'd like to do is this:
> >
> > add(new ResourceLink("downloadLink", new Resource() {
> > public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
> > return new FileResourceStream(
> > new wicket.util.file.File(filename)) {
> > public String getContentType() {
> > if (filename.toLowerCase().endsWith(".doc")) {
> > return "application/msword";
> > }
> > return super.getContentType();
> > }
> > };
> > }
> > }));
> >
> > But because FileResourceStream is final, I need to do something like
> > this instead:
> >
> > add(new ResourceLink("downloadLink", new Resource() {
> > public IResourceStream getResourceStream() {
> > return new IResourceStream() {
> > FileResourceStream frs = new FileResourceStream(
> > new wicket.util.file.File(filename));
> >
> > public String getContentType() {
> > if (filename.toLowerCase().endsWith(".doc")) {
> > return "application/msword";
> > }
> > return frs.getContentType();
> > }
> > public void close() throws IOException {
> > frs.close();
> > }
> > public InputStream getInputStream()
> > throws ResourceStreamNotFoundException {
> > return frs.getInputStream();
> > }
> > public Locale getLocale() {
> > return frs.getLocale();
> > }
> > public long length() {
> > return frs.length();
> > }
> > public void setLocale(Locale locale) {
> > frs.setLocale(locale);
> > }
> > public Time lastModifiedTime() {
> > return frs.lastModifiedTime();
> > }
> > };
> > }
> > }));
> >
> > Of course I should probably move this to a separate class, but,
> > regardless, if it weren't final, this would be easier.
> >
> > Of course any suggestions for how to do this more easily would also be
> > welcome! :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -- Scott Sauyet
> >
> > P.S. This class has the following Javadoc comment for its one (public)
> > constructor: "Private constructor to force use of static factory
> > methods." I don't think there is any static factory for this. There
> > certainly isn't one in the class itself.
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
> > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
> > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
> it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
> Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
