I think it is not too bad. Mem consumption is not that big, and can certainly be tweaked. Certainly no problem if you work with sticky sessions. I'm trying to set up a Tomcat cluster; hopefully I can provide you/ list with some more data this weekend. Anyone else doing clustering & Wicket together?
Eelco On 29 Sep 2005 14:04:00 +0200, Voors Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am interested to use wicket for a website, with fairly high traffic. One > reason why I want to use Wicket is its page state/or backbotton support. > There seems to be an/some issue(s) about the (big) memory usage in the way > Wicket is keeping pagestate. Is this (still) true, is the problem solved, or > is it not true at all? > > > Paul Voors > > ATP - The Advanced Travel Partner > www: www.atp.nl > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
