/The/ big difference between a component/ event based framework like
Wicket and a (web) continuations framework is that with Wicket your
focus should be what's on your pages and how it reacts to user input,
using different pages to address different areas of functionality,
while with a continuations framework you focus on the flow of the
application (think in flows and have things like 'processAndWait' as
transition marks). There is no 'better' approach imo. For the kind of
applications I am usually involved in making, Wicket is a better fit,
and in my experience analysts are usually more focussed on direct
interaction/ domain functionality than on flow. Might be different for
you though.

Eelco

On 10/5/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That was part of my point earlier on. There is a difference between
> the 'normal' continuations concept and how it is applied to web
> frameworks though. There are people working on 'native' continuations
> support.
>
> Here's a must-read on the topicus, which discusses a lot of points
> that are relevant to Wicket as well (like I said, the way Wicket and
> web continuations work doesn't differ that much imo):
> http://common-lisp.net/project/ucw/docs/html/rest/rest.html
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 10/5/05, Justin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, rife supports continuations in java.  https://rife.dev.java.net/
> >
> > Timo Stamm wrote:
> > > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > >
> > >> Actually, when you look closer to the whole continuation thing,
> > >> continuations are not so incompattible with how Wicket works now.
> > >
> > >
> > > I guess the problem is that continuations are not really compatible with
> > > java. An elegant implementation of continuations in java seems to be
> > > impossible.
> > >
> > >
> > > The
> > >
> > >> original idea of continuations is to never return a value, but pass a
> > >> context object (continuation) to the next function call. That idea
> > >> translated to webapplications seems to be to have a 'wait-for-input'
> > >> concept, so that you can model a flow like a couple of linear steps
> > >> that conceptually 'pause'/ wait for input before it moves to the next
> > >> step. As Wicket has a current state and does not work with return
> > >> values for flow, I think we could defend that we do the same thing as
> > >> the original definition, though with a slightly different flavor. At
> > >> least it has the same net effect. And... if you want to do the web
> > >> variant of continuations... that's easy... just create a mini
> > >> framework that handles the flow and - I think - you're done.
> > >
> > >
> > > That would just be a state machine.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Or... maybe I don't get the idea of continuations just yet. Please
> > >> correct me if that is the case :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Have a look at this article:
> > > http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-contin.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Jetty 6 is going to have continuation support. Are there any plans of
> > > supporting jetty continuations?
> > >
> > > http://www.mortbay.com/MB/log/gregw/?permalink=Jetty6Continuations.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Timo
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
> > > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> > --
> > Justin Lee
> > http://www.antwerkz.com
> > AIM : evan chooly
> > 720.299.0101
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
> > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to