oh , i got a little over enthusiastic when i saw it working ,
but now i noticed that it doesn't retain the form state as Johan mentioned.
Regards
Dipu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eelco Hillenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] wicket patttern question?
The wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications does not trigger any form
validation, as it is just a GET request to the component itself. And
in the handler method, you can e.g. set the visibility properties of
the panels/ component you want to show.
Also, if that doesn't do the trick for you pls. take a look at some of
the sources of the components. Most components are quite easy to
understand really, and if you need to do something highly specific,
great chance you can create such a component without too many
troubels.
Eelco
On 10/11/05, Dipu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What we want is to add some additional HTML elements to the form based on
the newly selected value in the drop down.
and we can do that using panels, but ideally we would like to bypass the
validation when the form
is submitted when the drop down value is changed .
Regards
Dipu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eelco Hillenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] wicket patttern question?
If you only want the value of the drop down box to be updated
immediately, you can override wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications and
let it return true. This results in a get that updates the component
only.
Eelco
On 10/10/05, Dipu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By default, Wicket runs the form validation stuff when the submit button
> is clicked. In our application, when a drop down box value is changed,
> we wish to do a form submit (without validation of the rest of the form)
> so that the form can be updated with changes relevant to the new value
> of the drop down box. Then when the submit button is clicked, we wish
> the form to be validated in the normal way.
>
> Is there a best "Wicket Way" of doing this or should we hack it using
> multiple forms or modify the validation process to skip validation under
> certain circumstances etc?
>
> Regards
> Dipu
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
