> > I think the idea is to keep the core as small as possible. As long as > it is easy for users to build the extensions they need, this is to my > mind a good idea, as it keeps the core APIs smaller and easier to learn.
I agree. If not part of core, it'd be part of wicket-extension than, which is meant for components which are still required often, but are not important enough to go into core. Note that Wicket-extension is under the same "strict" guidelines as wicket-core. We expect wicket-extension to be part of most wicket web apps. At least that is the idea. Juergen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
