Hi Phil and Igor,
thank You for the quick answers, the great overview and the phonebook-patch.
It is exactly what I was looking for!
Again, many thanks.
Maik
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
While I agree with Phil, a lot of other people do not. the spring
integration package is still very much a work in progress and thats why
ive spent very little time on the documentation. That said, all the
major pieces of it have javadoc and unit tests. What it lacks is an
overview, so here it is:
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Spring
I only had time for one pass, so its prob got some mistakes in it, feel
free to add/fix/cleanup whatever you think it needs.
I am also attaching a patch for the wicket-phonebook project which takes
advantage of the new wicket-contrib-spring lazy init proxies.
-Igor
On 11/14/05, *Phil Kulak* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
It's best to keep your app context beans in the Wicket application.
See the wicket-phonebook example in wicket-stuff cvs.
On 11/14/05, Maik Dobryn <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> I'm very new to Wicket. The last days I tried to figure out how the
> Spring integration in Wicket works.
>
> There is a lot of confusion about the most recent practice.
> Unforturnatly, no documentation does exist which covers this
important
> technique.
>
> So would You please provide a small (code) example of setting up a
> Spring application context and injecting a bean at page level?
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
