Whoops, the missing test files in attachment ... :-) On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, now I have a first attempt to submit. > > It is what "could" be considered as a cleaner way to address Matej's > initial problem. > But it is a hack to the core, so it's normal that I've come up with > something cleaner I think. > > And as it's a modification to the core, it's also more error-prone. > > It is too late tonight for me to explain what I did, so please for the > moment take a look at the 2 new classes versions : > > wicket.markup.html.form.Form > wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent > > or the diffs files if you prefer. > > And I've joined 2 very basic test files (markup & class) > > In short : in the new version, on formSubmitted(), child form > components are told that a new user input is available (method > FormComponent.newUserInputAvailable()). > In this method, the FormComponent stores the user input in a rawInput field. > This rawInput is then available for re-rendering for both use cases : > when data is invalid and when model is not up to date (for example > when returning from another page as in Matej's use case, the form will > be rendered again with the rawInput, and not the model). > > You can see that it also frees the FormComponent code from the weird > NO_INVALID_INPUT constant (by using a modelUpToDate boolean field) > > Fiuu, time to sleep now ! :-) > > regards, > > -- > laurent > > >
Form.java.diff
Description: Binary data
Form.java
Description: Binary data
FormComponent.java
Description: Binary dataTitle: Wicket SmartForms Test Page ...
FormComponent.java.diff
Description: Binary data
TestPage.java
Description: Binary data
TestPage.properties
Description: Binary data