Sounds like a plan. We have been discussing and voting about Application vs ApplicationSettings anyway, where most people agreed it would be better to move most 'configuration stuff' in the broad sense to settings. In this case, it makes sense to put it in ApplicationPages.
Eelco On 12/10/05, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thought I had, in my Application class I call: > > getPages().setHomePage(Comments.class); > > but call mountBookmarkablePage() on the application. > > Would it make sense to define mounts from the AplicationPages instance as > that seems to keep all the information about page settings? > > Mark > > > On 12/11/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm currently refactoring the mounting (and request targets) part to > > support more cases, like package mounting. Hard to get right though... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
