I'm pretty sure that others than me had the same interrogation when reading here and then that wicket is unmanaged, and that it was associated with wickets strength.
On 12/13/05, Laurent PETIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question that I never asked before, but as time passes, I > still have the same question in mind, so there I am (hope this is not > a too stupid question) : > > On 12/7/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i dont really know if this is a place we want to take wicket because it > > would make it a bit more managed. > > What is so bad with Wicket being a bit, or a lot, .. "managed" ? > > What would this prevent ? ... > > I'm pretty sure you have a clear answer for that, and maybe it should > be clear to me too, so if you have time please tell me, or send me to > internet urls where this has (potentially) been (over ?)debated in the > past ... ? > > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > Laurent > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
