http://www.site.com/?path=0 are not illegal, at least i dont think. depends on the browser/server i guess.

the main problem with the /* mapping is that you now map every request through the wicket servlet, so all your static content ends up being served through wicket which adds some overhead.

-Igor


On 1/16/06, Dan Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually put Apache in front of Tomcat for serving the static content.

It seems to be going well: Thank you.

However, I was wondering if I can get rid of that redirect somehow.  So,
if there's no filename, it will serve the dynamic content (from wicket)
while, if there is a filename, it will grab the static content.

Or, are URLs like

http://www.site.com/?path=0

illegal?

Thanks,
Dan


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to