> But wouldn't it suffice to just make the new constructors available, and > put a clear statement in the API docs? Then maybe deprecate the public > add() in the next major version, and drop it in 2.0 or something like that?
That's an option we discussed, and as usual is has opponents and proponents. I am against this as we would end up doing extra work supporting it, probably resulting in a half baked solution. Furthermore, it wouldn't be enough incentive for people to make to move. I am always in favor of clarity and breaking early in these matters. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
