On 2/20/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not weird in my opinion to have it leave the span tag. By leaving it
> in there, you maintain previewability between your rendered output and the
> actual template.

Agreed, it's a valid point. My beef with the span tags are more the
fact that the are all over the place and the have no semantic meaning
in the document.
For instance the navmenu - component:

<div id="navdiv" class="floatRight widthB">
                    <span>
    <div class="floatRight widthB">
       <span>
<div>
 <ul class="">

  <li><a 
href="/plan/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:se.curalia.plan.web.page.ListPlanningRegionsPage"><span>Planeringsområde</span></a>
  </li>
 </ul>
</div>
</span>
The span tags here have no meaning at all. In my opinion, it makes the
document structure harder to follow . It's a tradeoff between
flexibility and readability. I may have been a little bit to hasty in
my earlier comment :)

/Mats


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to