-Igor
On 2/21/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First I thought, good idea. But than, what is the difference between
putting the _javascript_ into a js file (like you suggest) and adding
<script ..href="" to the head section.
Actually you could try to implement it yourself. (Ajax-)behaviors are
kind of similar, as they add code to a header section as well.
Juergen
On 2/21/06, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I just had an idea that I thought I'd throw out there for disucssion and/or
> flamage ;-)
>
> At first I found wickets class/html-in-package scheme kinda awkward but now
> I'm used to it I like it. Anyway, an idea I just had was to extend this a
> bit further and breaking out the _javascript_ used for a page to its own file.
> So instead of having:
>
> <html>
> <body>
> <wicket:head>
> <script type="text/_javascript_">
> function submitWork(form, e) {
> ....
>
> inside your component/page, you could extract the script to a .js file named
> the same:
>
> MyPage.java
> MyPage.html
> MyPage.properties
> MyPage.js <-- added
>
> This wouldn't replace the use of <wicket:head/> but complement, if such a
> MyPage.js is found, it could be injected into the <head/> of the rendered
> page automatically.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> i like my video games - mamma said they are gonna melt my brains
> i like my video games - i don't care what daddy said; they're my reality
> - henning pauly
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
