Ah! A stupid typo on my part. Rather than getPageClass(), I kept writing getPage().
That works as I expected because that's what I (erroneously) thought I was doing all along. Thanks again! On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:23 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote: > no again. then you set an instance. And getPage() is the same as doing > nothing because that is the > page where we return to by default. > > So if you set the response page to a page instances we can't redirect > to a mount because a mount is > a bookmarkable page > > When targeting a instance the url must be something like wicket:xxx:0 > > johan > > > On 3/15/06, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry... Below I didn't say "new MyPage()", I said "getPage > ()". > > It didn't work with getPage(), which in theory should return > the same glass. > Does this still make any difference? > > > Thanks for your patience, > Dave > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Johan Compagner > Sent: 15 March 2006 19:25 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] setResponsePage() to a mounted link > > > I did say this for a reason: > setResponsePage(MyPage.class) > so don't do > setResponsePage(new MyPage()) > > because if you make an instance we have to really redirect to > that > instances. > And als we can do a bookmarkable redirect. > So yes there is a difference. > > > johan > > > > On 3/15/06, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 10:34 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote: > > redirect again to a bookmarkable/mounted page: > > > > add(new Link("toEnglishLink") > > { > > public void onClick() > > { > > getSession().setLocale > ( Locale.ENGLISH ); > > setResponsePage(MyPage.class) > > } > > }); > > Yeah, I did: > > setResponsePage( getPage() ) > > but it had the same effect. It took me to the link /app? > lotsOfFunkyParameterStuff, rather than /my/mounted/path. > > Is there a difference between using getPage() and > MyPage.class? I > wouldn't think so... > > In any case, the above is available to all my pages in a > superclass. It > would be a bit cumbersome to have to use the static class > parameter in > each page... > > > Is there a nicer way, perhaps? > > > Thanks! > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking > scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend > the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new > coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking > scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend > the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new > coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
