heh, i think its random enough. how many decimal places does it show? but you guys can do whatever you want of course :)

-Igor


On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
System.nanoTime () is @since 1.5, so I don't think it's usable anyway :)

Johan Compagner wrote:
> i think millis will do. If you have a request in the same milli second
> for the same image.
> Then the image should really be the same, What can possible change in 1
> milli! :)
>
> johan
>
>
> On 5/9/06, *Martijn Dashorst* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     On 5/9/06, *Matej Knopp* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Johan Compagner wrote:
>         >  still the question remains how random is random ;)
>         right. maybe one shared atomically increased integer would do
>         better job?
>
>
>
>     System.nanoTime() should do the trick :-)
>
>     Martijn
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to