Ah. sorry :)

On 5/20/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we wheren't talking about the GWT at this time anymore  but about CSS and
the content-box model.

johan



On 5/20/06, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
What do you mean it doesn't work? As the target platform? Sure Safari
works. Just not out-of-the-box for development.

Eelco

On 5/19/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do you have a example html for me where all the stuff is in what you do
and
> where i can see/test
> in all the browsers that i have to support?
>
> I would like to have such a test html.
>
> johan
>
>
>
>  On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Citát Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > hmm.. that sucks. I tested in in konqueror and it worked. As far as i
know
> > safari uses khtml. I wonder where the problem is...
> >
> > -matej
> >
> > > hmmm can't use it
> > > We have to target that shitty mac (sorry guys ;) ) and it seems that
the
> > > default browser
> > > safari doesn't work as far as i could test.
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/18/06, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The doctype is xhtml transitional. But there's an additional comment
> > > > (<!-- -->) before doctype to trick IE and make it work in quirks
mode.
> > > > (Because in standard compliance mode IE uses the W3C box model,
which
> > > > sucks).
> > > > This should work with strict too. Also <?xml header would do this,
but
> > > > wicket is kind of reluctant to print it, so i just put comment
there).
> > > >
> > > > So far, this setup works (tested) for Firefox, Opera, Konqueror,
> IE5.0+.
> > > > Only thing i'm not sure with is IE7. If it won't be fooled by
comment
> > > > before doctype and won't allow to set box-sizing in standard
> compliance
> > > > mode there will be a problem. I hope MS engineers are sane enough to
> > > > implement box-sizing css property, which is currently supported by
any
> > > > decend browser (except for IE of course).
> > > >
> > > > -Matej
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Johan Compagner wrote:
> > > > > So you are saying that it is possible to support many browser to
get
> > > > > border-box?
> > > > >
> > > > > hmm that would solve so many problems we have...
> > > > >
> > > > > So you let IE stay in quircks mode and have for firefox that
> > > > > -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
> > > > > and for other browsers (maybe IE7) the CSS3? standard: box-sizing:
> > > > > border-box;
> > > > >
> > > > > What is your doctype?
> > > > >
> > > > > johan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/18/06, *Matej Knopp* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > > > >      > allow myself to quote...myself
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      > || imho, html is the best layout manager out there for
> browser
> > > > >     apps. add
> > > > >      > css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      > i never said css was great for layout manager :) and yes
the
> box
> > > > >     model
> > > > >      > is broken.
> > > > >     The box model really is broken. Therefore I always stick with
IE
> box
> > > > >     model
> > > > >
> > > > >                             * {
> > > > >                                     box-sizing:
> border-box;
> > > > >
> -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
> > > > >                             }
 > > > > >
> > > > >     The only thing to take care of is not to allow IE6 to work in
> > > > >     standard-compliance mode. So far, I had no problems with this
> setup.
> > > > I'm
> > > > >     doing quite complicated layouts using just css (no tables) and
> > > > >     everything works fine. I just hope that IE7 won't screw
> everything
> > > > up.
> > > > >
> > > > >     -Matej
> > > > >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      > -Igor
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      > On 5/17/06, *Johan Compagner* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >      > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >     ha! and css is easier then layout manager in java...
> > > > >      >     hmm that is not how i see it.
> > > > >      >     CSS is just plain horrible stupid box thing..
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >     And what is a layout manager in css? There isn't one
> > > > >     everything is
> > > > >      >     sort of absoluut positioned and then you can do in
swing
> also
> > > > >      >     (not recommended ofcourse)
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >     johan
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >     On 5/17/06, *Igor Vaynberg* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >      >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote:
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >         imho, html is the best layout manager out there for
> > > > browser
> > > > >      >         apps. add css to the mix and you have a great skin
> > > > >     manager as well.
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >         the one thing you always hear swing developers
> bitching
> > > > >     about is
> > > > >      >         how they have to fight the layout managers to get
the
> > > > results
> > > > >      >         they want. gridbaglayout is poweful but its a huge
> pain
> > > > >     to work
> > > > >      >         with.
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >         matisse+grouplayout are the holy grail for swing
> devels,
> > > > its
> > > > >      >         nice and easy to create layouts. but it still
> requires a
> > > > >     gui to
> > > > >      >         do this, while i can do html easily by hand. also
> browser
> > > > >     screen
> > > > >      >         space doesnt translate easily to the desktop space.
> in
> > > > >     desktop
> > > > >      >         space you are pixel aware, you are also pixel aware
> of
> > > > your
> > > > >      >         fonts and the south east corner of the window. in
> html
> > > > >     you have
> > > > >      >         none of these things.
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >         look at wingS framework examples, they use layout
> > > > >     managers. look
> > > > >      >         how rectangular their examples look.
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >         -Igor
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >         On 5/17/06, *Frank Silbermann *
> > > > >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >      >         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >             I, personally, don't care for HTML, and perhaps
I
> > > > >     might enjoy
> > > > >      >             programming in Echo2 better.
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >             But suppose an employer maintained an HTML
> fragment
> > > > with
> > > > >      >             links to their
> > > > >      >             entire portfolio of web applications, and
wanted
> this
> > > > >      >             fragment to appear
> > > > >      >             on every page of each web application.  Since
> someone
> > > > >     else is
> > > > >      >             maintaining that scrap and keeping it
up-to-date,
> I
> > > > would
> > > > >      >             not want to
> > > > >      >             translate it into Echo 2 and maintain my own
> copy.
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >             Would it not likely be easier to incorporate
such
> an
> > > > HTML
> > > > >      >             scrap into a
> > > > >      >             Wicket application, versus one written in a
> framework
> > > > >     such
> > > > >      >             as Echo 2
> > > > >      >             that abstracted away the HTML completely?
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >             -----Original Message-----
> > > > >      >             From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > > >      >
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >     <mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > > > >      >             [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > > > > >     <mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >      >
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] On
> Behalf
 > > > > >      >             Of Eelco
> > > > >      >             Hillenius
> > > > >      >             Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
> > > > >      >             To:
> [email protected]
> > > > >     <mailto: [email protected] >
> > > > >      >             <mailto:
> [email protected]
> > > > >     <mailto: [email protected]>>
> > > > >      >             Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Google Web Toolkit
> > > > >     integration ?
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >             >  It's certainly an intriguing idea (have a
look
> at
> > > > >     haxe.org < http://haxe.org >
> > > > >      >             <http://haxe.org> if you find
> > > > >      >             >  it interesting), ...
> > > > >      >             ...
> > > > >      >             Yeah. I see some advantages of using layout
> managers
> > > > -
> > > > >      >             basically the
> > > > >      >             same promise as Swing has - but currently I
would
> > > > still
> > > > >      >             prefer using
> > > > >      >             HTML for layout. If I would like the GWT way of
> > > > >     developing
> > > > >      >             applications, I would have choosen Echo 2 a
long
> time
> > > > >     ago.
> > > > >      >             GWT looks
> > > > >      >             like a next gen Echo to me, though with a very
> big
> > > > name
> > > > >      >             behind it, and
> > > > >      >             some cool innovations. ... Eelco
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >      >             Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to
support
> web
> > > > >      >             services, security?
> > > > >      >             Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated
> technology
> > > > to
 > > > > >      >             make your job easier
> > > > >      >             Download IBM WebSphere Application Server
v.1.0.1
> > > > >     based on
> > > > >      >             Apache Geronimo
> > > > >      >
> > > > >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
> <
> > > >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
>
> > > > >      >
> > > > >     <
> > > >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642
> > > > >     <
> > > >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642
> >>
> > > > >      >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > >      >             Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > >      >
> [email protected]
> > > > >     <mailto:[email protected] >
> > > > >      >             <mailto:
> [email protected]
> > > > >     <mailto: [email protected]>>
> > > > >      >
> > > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > >
>
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >      >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >     Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
services,
> > > > >     security?
> > > > >     Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make
> your
> > > > >     job easier
> > > > >     Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on
> Apache
> > > > >     Geronimo
> > > > >
> > > >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > > >     <
> > > >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642>
 > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > >     Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > >     [email protected]
> > > > >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
> security?
> > > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
job
> > > > easier
> > > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> > > >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
> >
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________

Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user




-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to