On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 17:02 +0200, Timo Stamm wrote: > Otan schrieb: > > Hola, > > > > Please make the Javadoc more informative. The Wicket Example is fine and I > > always learn from it, but, I think the example is limited; so, the Javadoc > > is the one I look into most of the time. > >
I am rather surprised by this. I am an avid fan of javadoc. It's the first place I look for API documentation. I find wicket's javadoc to be very good. I am sure that the maintainers would be happy to have patches against the javadoc where changes need to be made. Also, specific classes that you think are not documented well enough would probably be helpful. Your statement was rather general and vague. If I where a maintainer, I wouldn't know where to start in order to help you with your problem. -- Philip A. Chapman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
