On 07/08/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> im not a wiki admin so hopefully gwyn is reading with us ;)

You are, actually! :-)

Anyway, it's certainly worth suggesting to people who're adding code
that they mention the version they're using, but I'm not sure how easy
it'd be to tweak the wiki to ensure there's a field to be set...


> as far as the mounts it shouldnt be a problem, wicket resolves the
> longest mount it can first.
> -Igor
> On 8/7/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > well, after "playing around" for only 3 days it might be a bit too early,
> > but basicly i would do some work in that way -
> >
> > btw: you mentioned the wiki and sth, that had was a big problem is that the
> > wiki never tells you what version is covered with the current page, so you
> > should add a needed field there where the users have to enter the version of
> > wicket they write this for
> >

Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! - http://wicketframework.org

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
Wicket-user mailing list

Reply via email to