On 07/08/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > im not a wiki admin so hopefully gwyn is reading with us ;)
You are, actually! :-) Anyway, it's certainly worth suggesting to people who're adding code that they mention the version they're using, but I'm not sure how easy it'd be to tweak the wiki to ensure there's a field to be set... /Gwyn > as far as the mounts it shouldnt be a problem, wicket resolves the > longest mount it can first. > > -Igor > > > On 8/7/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well, after "playing around" for only 3 days it might be a bit too early, > > but basicly i would do some work in that way - > > > > btw: you mentioned the wiki and sth, that had was a big problem is that the > > wiki never tells you what version is covered with the current page, so you > > should add a needed field there where the users have to enter the version of > > wicket they write this for > > -- Download Wicket 1.2.1 now! - http://wicketframework.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
