> The last remark is not clear to me, I have look into Wicket 2.0 sources.
The difference between 1.x and 2.x is that in 2 you can apply generics to models and components. For example, you can now do this: public MyComponent(MarkupContainer p, IModel<MyType> m) forcing on clients that a model is passed in that returns an object 'MyType'. In 1.x, you could only do public MyComponent(MarkupContainer p, IModel m) which neither forces proper use nor is very readable. So often, if you need component dependencies to be strong typed, what you would do in 1.x is: public MyComponent(MarkupContainer p, MyType o) Working with generics like we now support in 2 has all the flexibility of working with IModels, but with the additional advantage of strong typing. Eelco * btw, that first argument p is only needed for 2.0, but I kept in in the example so that it wouldn't distract. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
