Hi Eelco, Nino,
> I'm not even sure whether I agree :) Wicket can be hard for people
> that are not comfortable with OO programming...
>
> I did not have a very small learning curve, nor did the two other consultants
> working here.
>
I guess 'very small learning curve' is off then. I must confess I have
to unlearn myself as well even though I have plenty of pure OO
experiences and even though I have never ever liked PHP, JSP and even
rhtml. (Shameless plug for RoR and html template fans: see project
Persia http://blog.finalist.com/2006/09/25/finalist_project_persia/.)
How about:
- No need to learn new languages, Java and HTML is sufficient.
About the experienced developer: there should be an experienced
developer an any non trivial project. So this should not be a problem.
>> Good support for modern web pages (AJAX), while ... FireFox 1.0 is not
>> supported.
>>
> This is not inherently true for the framework though....
True, but that is not good enough for this very biased list :)
Regards,
Erik.
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
