I looked at the other post that references StringResponse and serializable and it was specifically for 2.0. But it looks like you put a fix in that codebase for it. Did not patch get applied to the 1.3 branch?
ChuckDeal wrote: > > I still have to test it some more. But as I was playing with it, when the > Application object was NOT serialized, it would fail the first time I hit > one of my data pages; but if I hit the same page again, it worked fine. > > I also had a problem when using the ModalWindow to load a Page where it > was trying to serialize StringResponse, but I believe there are already > posts on the mailing list for that, so I will try and find those posts > first before going to far. > > Chuck > > > Johan Compagner wrote: >> >> that is something wrong in your code >> Or maybe a bug in wicket somewhere but more people should see that then >> Application object should never be serialized. At what point do you have >> to >> serialize it? >> >> I think you hold on to it somewhere in your code. >> >> johan >> >> >> On 12/7/06, ChuckDeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> in 1.3, should Application implement Serializable? >>> >>> I am in the process of switching to the 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT builds >>> and >>> I >>> needed to implement Serializable on my APplication object. I checked >>> the >>> Wiki (Migrating from 1.2 to 1.3) and this wasn't mentioned. >>> >>> Is this required for 1.3 or have I got something wrong with my code? >>> Everything was peachy with the latest 1.2-SNAPSHOT. >>> >>> Chuck >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Application-must-implement-Serializable--tf2771344.html#a7730054 >>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share >>> your >>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wicket-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share >> your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> Wicket-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Application-must-implement-Serializable--tf2771344.html#a7742172 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
