>
> Handling the session directly sounds very un-wickety.
> Normally you should keep state in your components. They are
> all(?) stateful in Wicket.
>
I suppose I should elaborate a little bit:) I've got the following session class
public final class UserSession extends WebSession{
private String username;
public UserSession(final WebApplication
application){super(application);}
...}
And I've got a WelcomePage class as such:
public class WelcomePage extends SecureBasePage{
private String username;
public WelcomePage(){
super();
setUsername((getUserSession()).getUsername());
add(new Label("username", new PropertyModel(this,"username")));
}
public String getUsername() {return username;}
public void setUsername(String username) {this.username = username;}
}
and SecureBasePage is :
public class SecureBasePage extends WebPage {
public SecureBasePage(){
super();
verifyAccess();
}
public void verifyAccess(){
if(!(isUserLoggedIn())){
throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(Index.class);
}
}
protected boolean isUserLoggedIn(){
return (getUserSession()).isUserLoggedIn();
}
}
So now I want to unit test rendering of WelcomePage. However I need to
have a UserSession object with the username set up. I have no idea how
to this via WicketTester.
Is there any way to this?
cheers
srdjan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
