ok. if you say so. i don't know the details here.
Eelco Hillenius wrote: > >> right. i wasn't talking about instances. only interfaces and method >> calls. conceptually, if you have a session that is a store of pages >> (the page map). you can ask the session for an interface that gives >> you pages. > > But then you need to have a session first, and where to get that from > is exactly the responsibility of the session store. > > Another problem is that we save the session, which would then have to > save it's reference to the store via that store. No, we took quite a > couple of iterators to get to the Session/ ISessionStore thing we have > now, and this has been the only way in which it actually works. > > Eelco > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/second-level-cache---why-not-to-use-ehcache-tf3227180.html#a8977031 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
