On 2/18/07, Ryan Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With JSR 310 on the way, you'll be ahead of your time if you support > DateTime ;) > > While you obviously have to support java.util.Date, it sounds like a > great idea to sort of promote Joda-Time by providing out of the box > support for DateTime. Partly due to JSR 310, I bet you'll see more > and more shops coming to the same conclusion we did recently: stop > hiding Joda-Time exclusively inside complex date/time logic and just > push it all the way through the app -- from persistence layer to UI.
I agree. I just don't want to force users to use it exclusively, but rather let them choose for themselves. I'm not sure about whether I want to make that choice explicit or transparently; the latter being nice for users I guess, but it would clutter the implementations a bit. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
