at least if in devel mode you should log a warning if you detect this. or do
you not detect its in a constructor...you just push a new target?
-igor
On 2/19/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/19/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sure, but does it abort the page or do you end up with an extra page in
the
> pagemap?
No, it doesn't abort the request. If you want to do that you need to
use that exception. So while it typically doesn't make sense to call
setResponsePage in a constructor, it is not *wrong* nor should Wicket
- like we did - ignore it altogether.
Eelco
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
