Hi, We (Wicket's developers) are having some discussion over 1.3 vs 2.0 and how difficult it is as a nun-funded project to spend so much time synchronizing the branches.
A major issue in the discussion is that not everyone is convinced anymore that the constructor change in 2.0 is for the better. There are pros and cons for sure, but we want to get your opinion on this. Please help us out giving your opinion. We want to know: 1) Who uses 2.0 for serious projects? 2) What do you think of the constructor change? Do you prefer 1.3's add style or 2.0's style of passing in the parent construction time. 3) If we would ever backtrack on the constructor change (*if*, don't panic for now) how much trouble would that give you? Please don't be shy giving your opinion. This is an important issue in the future development of Wicket. Regards, Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
