... and having two active development branches seems like a really bad idea. /Anders
Anders Peterson wrote: > I don't care about (understand) the pros and cons regarding the > constructor change. What Wicket needs is parameterized models > (generics). I think you should do what ever it takes to support this > in a released version as soon as possible. > > /Anders > > Gabor Szokoli wrote: >> On 3/7/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Also please if you decide to not use the new constructor go on a >>> JDK1.5 solo >>> dev path soon >> >> +1 for this if I understand it right :-) >> We are not committed to either version yet, do basic prototypes in >> 1.2, but untyped getModel() is getting on my nerves already. (How did >> we ever use java without generics?) >> I am on principle against severe API changes unless they bring >> significant benefits, but do not feel myself competent to judge the >> current situation. >> >> >> Gabor Szokoli >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >> share your >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
