Actually, it should be fixed already. Can you please check if it works as it should?
-Matej On 3/14/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I do not see difference between you two ;) samples > > but maybe you was talking about that : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-387. > > I think, it will be fixed soon. > > cheers > > -- > Vincent > http://www.demay-fr.net/blog/ > > ChuckDeal a écrit : > > wicket-ajax.js (revision 518211) appears to have a problem. > > > > I think lines 296-299 should be > > var e = element.childNodes[i]; > > if (e.tagName != null) { > > result += Wicket.Form.serialize(e); > > } > > > > but right now they are > > var e = element.childNodes[i] { > > if (e.tagName != null) { > > result += Wicket.Form.serialize(e); > > } > > } > > > > Chuck > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
