Someone should really make an example or even a reusable class like that. What you're suggesting is very non-obvious to a newbie.
Jean-Baptiste Quenot-3 wrote: > > * ZedroS Schwart: > >> Regarding static content, is it such a big issue to have some >> wicket html pages with empty classes behind ? > > You don't even need empty classes to serve static content with > Wicket, just use a custom IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy together > with a ResourceStreamRequestTarget to serve the content from an > IResourceStream (can be a static file). > -- > Jean-Baptiste Quenot > aka John Banana Qwerty > http://caraldi.com/jbq/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Joost-uses-Wicket-tf3390296.html#a9540623 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
