> Yeah, that does sound like overkill in a single-threaded environment.
> What other thread would ever be accessing a session's feedback messages?

Furthermore, copy on write is efficient when there are lots of reads
and just a couple of writes, but that's not the case I think. So
normal synchronization would almost certain be more efficient here.

Eelco

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to