thomas,
i just dont have the time to look into this further. my hunch is that it
should work. there is nothing wrong with taking a componenttag and upgrading
it to a wickettag at any point in the chain. so do give it a try and see if
you really do hit a wall instead of playing the "what if" game.
-igor
On 4/13/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't <span wicket:id="fkjksdfjs"> a ComponentTag and <wicket:extend> a
WicketTag? Some WicketTags seem already to be processed in this chain, so
creating them later out of ComponentTags would not be a good solution.
Tom
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:48:54 +0200, Igor Vaynberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it will not be wrapped into wickettag, only wicket namespaced tags are.
> it
> will be wrapped into componenttag, but it is a chain, you can then wrap
> the
> componenttag into a wicket tag :)
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 4/12/07, Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > does it need to be before?
>>
>> Well, it should before XmlTags will be wrapped in
>> ComponentTags/WicketTags, isn't it?
>>
>> Tom
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
