I am sad to announce that my company did not choose to use wicket after
comparison with struts 2. :-(
it are 2 different worlds..
can you give me an example then with a page with 2 listviews on it
that are sortable for example on both struts and wicket ...
(ofcourse if i sort one then the other must be stable)
But what is then the difference in the number of things you have?
in wicket you have just the java and the html what lines of what kind of
code
do you then not have with struts 2 (keeping the same behavior)
One criticism that came out as we were looking at Wicket code was that
there seems to be a need to write a lot of Java code in a ListView for
such things as displaying a table. Although I did not see this issue as
out-weighing all the benefits, many of my colleagues did.
a lot of? a simple ListView you just have to implement one method:
populateItem()
How is that a lot?
Is there any plan or push or hidden feature that allows for a bean to be
directly mapped to a template without having to declare new Label(...)
for each field in the ListView. I think this would be a great win for
Wicket if adding those low-level components was only necessary when one
wants to add special handling, formating, validation, etc.
and where is then the binding specified? What kind of data should be
displayed where?
johan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
