On 7/6/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, just take a look at the project we are working on together. Such > fields mostly have getters and setters :)
two points: this is relatively new, i think it made it in just before 1.3-beta1 or somewhere there you didnt know about it, so of course you would be writing getters/setters - its easier to let the ide do that then write an inner class :) so you see - not having this feature leads to bad OO as you tend to break encapsulation -igor ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
