Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> On 7/19/07, David Rosenstrauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>> It is configurable: don't use PasswordTextField but TextField instead.
>> No. If you try to use a TextField, then wicket will insist that you
>> convert your HTML to use <input type="text"/> instead of <input
>> type="password"/> - and thus lose the masked password entry capabilities
>> (i.e., echoing "*" characters).
>
> In 1.3-beta2 the type is not specified: so you can use any type of
> field.
? I am using 1.3-beta2.
> IIUC (I don't have the code open) you can override the
> getType() method of the textfield, and return null.
>
> Martijn
>
Hmmm ... I don't think I totally understand what you're suggesting here:
new RequiredTextField() {
public Class getType() {
return ....what?!?!?;
}
}
And now that I check, that's not even allowed. getType() is final in
FormComponent.
DR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
