>       The material is ferrimagnetic and we have include that magnetic 
> ordering by properly editing case.inst file. Yes we have not tried mbj 
> potential and that may be an
> alternative. Our calculation is going on a system having 56 atoms/supercell 
> and it generally take around 80 iterations to converge for GGA+U 
> (ferrimagnetic) calculation. In
> this regard do you think that mbj potential can be a better alternative for 
> our ferrimagnetic insulating system?

Yes.
--

-----------------------------------------
Peter Blaha
Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43-1-5880115671
Fax: +43-1-5880115698
email: pblaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.at
-----------------------------------------

Reply via email to