Hi,

The struct file that I used is attached. For my purpose, the size of
the unit cell was large enough to avoid spurious interactions between
neighbouring cells. Note that a, b and c are different in order to avoid
to high symmetry.

F. Tran

On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Muhammad Sajjad wrote:

Dear Prof. Marks and F. TranThank you so much for your helpful suggestions. I 
was already doing the spin polarization calculations. I have got the convergence
by using
mixing factor 0.1, starting calculation with PRATT and then switched to MSR1 
after 7 cycles, and the command runsp_lapw -cc 0.00001 -in1ef -i 150
The obtained magnetic moment was 2.00009.

Dear Tran I would really appreciate if you share some more details about 
case.struct file. It will definitely be helpful for me as well as for others. 

Kind Regards
Dr. Sajjad

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:50 AM, <t...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
      The calculation for an isolated atom with a code which uses periodic
      boundary conditions (like WIEN2k) is not trivial. This is what I have done
      recently for most atoms of the periodic table (excluding f-systems), and
      for some of the transition-metal atoms this was extremely difficult to
      achieve convergence.

      A few hints (that I used):

      1) It is important (and necessary depending on the atom) to reduce the
      symmetry from cubic to, e.g., orthorhombic to be able to access the
      electronic configuration with the lowest energy (this is the procedure
      followed by several research groups like VASP for instance).
      If necessary I can give more details about the case.struct that I used.

      2) lapw0 requires a lot of memory, while lapw1 requires both
      memory and time. To reduce computer time for lapw1, I was using
      iterative digonalization (this was my command for all atoms):
      runsp_lapw -ec 0.0001 -cc 0.0001 -it -i 1000 -NI

      3) For the Ni atom the magnetic moment should be 2:
      :MMTOT:  SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT IN CELL     =    2.00238

      4) I was using the default setting for mixer.

      F. Tran

      On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Laurence Marks wrote:


            Also, only 1 k-point (Gamma), an RMT and RKMax similar to what you 
use for
            bulk Ni, particularly as I assume you are doing the calculation to 
get an
            enthalpy of formation. You may have to use the mpi versions as it is
            probably too large for a non-mpi run.

            If you are doing WC+U (or -ineece) the U (or on-site hybrid) 
removes the
            phase transition so convergence should be simple.

            Straight WC is not a simple calculation because the physics for an 
isolated
            Ni atom is wrong. With wrong physics there is in fact no guarantee 
that the
            calculation will ever converge!

            ___________________________
            Professor Laurence Marks
            Department of Materials Science and Engineering
            Northwestern University
            www.numis.northwestern.edu
            MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu
            Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
            "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what 
nobody
            else has thought"
            Albert Szent-Gyorgi

            On Dec 28, 2014 11:47 AM, "Laurence Marks" 
<l-ma...@northwestern.edu> wrote:

                  You almost certainly need to run spin polarized, probably MSR1
                  (GREED 0.1), TEMPS (room temp). The convergence is complicated
                  for WC (& simple GGAs) due to an electronic phase transition
                  between sp & d occupation near the fixed point.

                  ___________________________
                  Professor Laurence Marks
                  Department of Materials Science and Engineering
                  Northwestern University
                  www.numis.northwestern.edu
                  MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu
                  Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
                  "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think
                  what nobody else has thought"
                  Albert Szent-Gyorgi

                  On Dec 28, 2014 10:47 AM, "Muhammad Sajjad" 
<sajja...@gmail.com>
                  wrote:
                        Dear Users I am running SCF calculation for Ni with
                        lattice constant of 30 Bohr and using WC-GGA. The
                        calculation is not converging even upto 100
                        iterations and more. To solve the problem I have
                        performed following steps

            switched to TEMPS = 0.005 from TETRA
            Changed MSR1 to PRATT
            changed mixing factor (increase and decrease from 0.2)

            Thanking in advance. 

            Dr. Sajjad



_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



Ni                                                                             
P   LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS:  1                                                 
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang                                                     
 18.897269 18.991755 19.086241 90.000000 90.000000 90.000000                   
ATOM  -1: X=0.00000000 Y=0.00000000 Z=0.00000000
          MULT= 1          ISPLIT= 8
Ni         NPT=  781  R0=0.00005000 RMT=    1.8000   Z: 28.0                   
LOCAL ROT MATRIX:    1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
                     0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
                     0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
   8      NUMBER OF SYMMETRY OPERATIONS
-1 0 0 0.00000000
 0-1 0 0.00000000
 0 0-1 0.00000000
       1
-1 0 0 0.00000000
 0-1 0 0.00000000
 0 0 1 0.00000000
       2
-1 0 0 0.00000000
 0 1 0 0.00000000
 0 0-1 0.00000000
       3
-1 0 0 0.00000000
 0 1 0 0.00000000
 0 0 1 0.00000000
       4
 1 0 0 0.00000000
 0-1 0 0.00000000
 0 0-1 0.00000000
       5
 1 0 0 0.00000000
 0-1 0 0.00000000
 0 0 1 0.00000000
       6
 1 0 0 0.00000000
 0 1 0 0.00000000
 0 0-1 0.00000000
       7
 1 0 0 0.00000000
 0 1 0 0.00000000
 0 0 1 0.00000000
       8
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to