The lapw1c_mpi and lapw1_mpi are for mpi parallel, and the lapw1c and lapw1 difference is described in section "7.5 LAPW1 (generates eigenvalues and eigenvectors)" of the WIEN2k 14.2 usersguide on page 116 [ http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/textbooks/usersguide.pdf ].

It is recommended to follow the procedure in section "4.5.5 Spin-orbit interaction" of the WIEN2k 14.2 usersguide on page 47, where a spin-polarized calculation is followed by a spin-orbit calculation (and not the other way around).

Using WIEN2k 14.2 with clmchange.f fix [ http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12595.html ]?

On 7/10/2015 7:00 AM, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:
Dear all,
I am very new to WIEN2k . I was doing a spin-orbit calculation for a transition metal oxide compound by using WIEN2k_14.2. I followed the procedure of spin-orbit calculation from manual. I had run spin-orbit calculation followed by a simply spin-polarized calculation. But I got the following error

*lapwso -up  -p -c   (23:30:00) running LAPWSO in parallel mode
**LAPWSO crashed*
*
0.303u 0.387s 0:16.78 4.0%      0+0k 2696+4744io 10pf+0w
error: command /home/paresh/Downloads/WIEN2k_14.2/lapwsopara -up -c lapwso.def failed

stop error****
*
 I had just run the following command line
*runsp_lapw -p -so -i 100 -ec 0.0000000001 -cc 0.0001 -NI &*

But one thing I had noticed that the simply spin-polarized scf ran in * lapw0_mpi , lapw1c_mpi, and lapw2c_mpi *mode . Before I had done spin polarized scf calculation for another system, the scf was simply running in lapw0_mpi , lapw1_mpi, lapw2_mpi mode. Can any body tell me what's going wrong ? What is the difference between * lapw1c_mpi and lapw1_mpi *mode ?
Any help would be highly appreciated .



Kind Regards
Paresh Chandra Rout
Research Scholar
Indian Institute of Science education and Research, Bhopal
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html

Reply via email to