Yes, the "WILL BE IMPLEMENTED" message in your email seems to clearly indicate that the more complicated group theory is still not implemented in WIEN2k 14.2 [ http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/limitations/ ].

For a non-spin polarized calculation with spin-orbit, I think you can still find whether it is non-symmorphic or not by checking the case.outputs file since the symmetry is not changed in the struct file by initso [ http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg08031.html ], and you could try the shifting of k-vectors trick [ http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg08217.html ].

On 8/13/2015 3:23 AM, 남태식 wrote:
Hi. I'm using WIEN2k_14.2 version and have probelm on irrep (irreducible representation) calculation.
My system is CeFe2Al10 with spacegroup #63 (Cmcm).
I implemented scf cycle, with spin-orbit coupling (init_lapw and initso_lapw) & spin non-polarized, and plotted band with bandpath Z-R-S-GAMMA-Z-T-Y-GAMMA. When I tried to ! compile irrep calculation by x -irrep -so -p command (I implemented with parallel job), some of the symmetric points-Z,R,T gives the result like below in case.outputirso_1 file


********************************************************************************


knum =  1    kname= Z
k = 0.000000 0.000000 0.500000

 The point group is D2h
 8 symmetry operations in  8 classes
 Table 23   on page  39 in Koster  et al [7]
 Table 31.4 on page 247 in Altmann et al [8]

             E    C2    C2`   C2"    I   IC2   IC2`  IC2"
& nbsp;G1+   A1g   1     1     1 &! nbsp;   1 1     1     1     1
 G2+   B3g   1    -1     1    -1     1    -1     1    -1
 G3+   B1g   1     1    -1    -1     1     1    -1    -1
 G4+   B2g   1    -1    -1     1     1    -1    -1     1
 G1-   A1u   1     1     1     1    -1    -1    ! -1    -1
 G2-   B3u   1    -1     1    -1    -1     1    -1     1
 G3-   B1u   1     1    -1    -1    -1    -1     1     1
 G4-   B2u   1    -1    -1     1    -1     1     1    -1
 --------------------------------------------------------
 G5+   E1/2g 2     0     0     0     2    ! ; 0     0 0
 G5-   E1/2u 2     0     0     0    -2     0     0     0

 labeling of IRs can change due to choice of
 symmetry axes: G2 <-> G3 <-> G4

 Non-symmorphic crystal and k-point at the BZ surface:
 IR of the space group for this k-point cannot simpl! e
 be expressed as IR of the corresponding point group
 times a phase factor, since exp(-i*k(Ri*tj-tj)) not 1
 for all pair of {Ri|ti} and {Rj|tj}.



 WILL BE IMPLEMENTED


********* **************************************************************! *********

When I take GAMMA-Y-F0-S-GAMMA-Z-T-G0-R-Z bandpath, there was no result like this one in R,Z,T point. I wonder why I have this kind of result in certain bandpath (Z-R-S-GAMMA-Z-T-Y-GAMMA) although the parity or irrep result implemented on symmetric point shouldn't depend on the bandpath. Isn't the latest version of WIEN2k can't implement irrep calculation on Non-symmorphic crystal? Is this structre non-symmorphic crystal? Importantly, why this discrepancy in irrep result happens between two different bandpaths?

Many thanks!

Nam
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to