Dear Prof. Peter,

This is in the queue on my previous query regarding CH3NH3PbI3:

I used two strategy and got different results:

The experimental band gap is 1.67 eV for orthorhombic lead halide

I ran two cases (with PBE);
1. with 1000 k, div: ( 11  7 11) and "min -j 'run_lapw -p -I -NI -i 120 *-ec
*0.00001 *-ec * 0.0001 -fc 1
2. with 400 k, div: (  8  5  8)   and   min -j 'run_lapw -p -I -NI -i 120 *-ec
* 0.0001 *-ec * 0.0005 -fc 2'

-ec switch is used twice instead of ec and cc (it is by mistake)


1. GAP 1.687 eV,    FER: 0.1030934295, ENE: -339059.11079128
2. GAP  1.777 eV,   FER: 0.1004906191, ENE: -339059.12432403

In case 2 with less k-points and normal scf criteria (-ec 0.0001 -ec 0.0005
-fc 2), I got minimized ENE than case 1. But the band gap is good from case

You see that band gap is in the error of /+- 0.01eV.

I did nothing special, just reduced rmt (5% and further rmt of "I" was
reduced by 0.02).
Please correct me what is wrong here. Because usually PBE always
underestimates the experimental band gap.

Kind regards
Wien mailing list

Reply via email to