Ok, thanks. I know see in the WIEN2k usersguide  for the NEWT method
that the friction parameter ETA should effect the speed of movement when
the atom is moving by the non-zero steps sizes Delta(1), Delta(2),
and/or Delta(3) of the input values:
Delta(1) Delta(2) Delta(3) ETA
(Section "8.15.3 Input" on page 174 of the WIEN2k 17.1 usersguide)
On 8/4/2017 1:22 AM, Peter Blaha wrote:
It is NOT a divisor ! (does not make sense here). Depending on the
method the 4th value is not used or is eg. a friction term for damped
On 08/04/2017 02:26 AM, Gavin Abo wrote:
Currently too lazy to check, are the data values x y z div (where div is
So (x y z)/div:
0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 => (0, 0, 0)/0 = undefined  <- If it is not giving a
divide by zero error , it sounds like the code is able to handle it
and may be setting any of these divisions to 0.
0.0. 0.0 0.0 1.0 => (0, 0, 0)/1 = (0, 0, 0) <- This may be safer to use.
On 8/3/2017 9:26 AM, fatima DFT wrote:
Thank you very much Sir.
I feel relax now.
I did a heavy calculation using 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 instead of 0.0. 0.0
So I was worried to repeat the calculation by fixing the position with
0.0. 0.0 0.0 1.0.
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Laurence Marks
<l-ma...@northwestern.edu <mailto:l-ma...@northwestern.edu>> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, fatima DFT <fatimad...@gmail.com
Dear Prof. Peter, Oleg and Marks,
I have two queries for case.inM
I stuck on case.inM file where I want to fix the positions of
the heavier atom for which I do not want to relax the
A comment: fixing atoms does not do what people think, in general
it does not make the convergence of QM methods faster (it can for
CG). The convergence depends upon the number and density of the
elastic eigenvectors (PORT) and the elastic-electronic system
In one thread Prof Peter
mentioned keeping 0 0 0 0 in the respective row of atom that I
want to constrain. But this four zeros means the entire line
should be zero
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 #Atom 1 Generated by pairhess >>> Say
it is for La atom.
As per Prof Marks
The only first three number should be zero
0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 #Atom 1 Generated by pairhess
Could you please clear my doubt that:
How the results will differ if I will use "0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
#Atom 1 Generated by pairhess" instead of 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 ?
I am 99% confident that they are equivalent.
If I use "x pairhess" to generate the case.inM then does it
copy the case.inM according to the structure files? I just
tested it for two different structures and I saw two different
kind of case.inM.
Yes, different structures with different symmetries have different
symmetry constrained sites so different case.inM.
Thank you in advance
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think
what nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu> ; Corrosion in 4D:
Partner of the CFW 100% program for gender
equity, www.cfw.org/100-percent <http://www.cfw.org/100-percent>
Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
Wien mailing list
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: