Sorry, I don't know, but maybe more details about your calculation would be needed for someone else to answer your question.

For example, are you doing something similar to the Constraint U exercise [ http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/textbooks/Constraint_U.pdf ], which uses the F^0_eff formula of EPL vol. 69, 777 (2005) [ https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2004-10416-x , https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0412560v1 (equation 4)]?

For NiO [ https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg14460.html , http://wien2k-algerien1970.blogspot.com/2016/08/how-to-calculate-u-parameter-in-nickel.html ], I think that gave about:

ε3d_up = 0.119

ε3d_dn = -0.282

If those are the same parameters as in equation 11 of Phys. Rev. B vol. 44, 943 (1991) [ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ], then it looks like that would be:

J = ε3d_up - ε3d_dn = 0.12 - (-0.28) = 0.401

Though, one has to keep in mind that the Ueff values obtained from the Constrained method are known to be of questionable accuracy [ https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg15599.html ].  So, the J values might be of questionable accuracy as well. In addition, well converge results can be needed for such calculations [ https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_to_calculate_U_and_or_J_values_of_DFT_U ].

On 5/12/2018 6:28 AM, Wien2k User wrote:
Dear Prof. Tran and WIEN2k users;

I found in Anisimov's paper the following relation to calculate J
J=E3d'up'(n+0.5,n-0.5)-E3d'dn'(n+0.5,n-0.5)
but I think that the energy of the spin-up electrons is more stable compared to that of Dn electrons and that's why I found a negative energy (Do you think that this relationship is reversed?) or my reasoning is wrong and I have to review my calculations?

Thank you in advance

2018-05-11 18:47 GMT+02:00 Wien2k User <wien2k.u...@gmail.com <mailto:wien2k.u...@gmail.com>>:

    Thank you very much

    2018-05-11 16:09 GMT+02:00 Wien2k User <wien2k.u...@gmail.com
    <mailto:wien2k.u...@gmail.com>>:

        Dear Prof. P. BLAHA and WIEN2k users;

        I want to estimate the effective value of Hubbard term  "Ueff=U-J"

        Can the Hund's Exchange parameter (J) be negative?

        Thank you very much.


_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to