Hi,

If :DIS at the end of the calculation is in the
range 0.006-0.2, then it's huge. Do the calculations
with "-cc 0.0001".

FT

On Thursday 2019-01-17 21:19, Victor Zenou wrote:

Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:19:31
From: Victor Zenou <za...@post.bgu.ac.il>
Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: Re: [Wien] proper k-points for Nd

Dear Lauri
Thanks for your answer
I used only energy convergence criteria (10^-4). Still the charge convergence 
was between 0.006 and 0.2 e.
The nearest neighbor distance is 6.856 a.u, I used RMT=2.7 a.u., summed to 5.4 
which is much lower than 6.856. Usually large RMT is preferred to make the
calculations as fast as possible. I plan to check a phases in Al-Ti-Nd and I 
chose RMT equal to 2.3, 2.5 and 2.7 respectively.
Victor



‫בתאריך יום ה׳, 17 בינו׳ 2019 ב-11:16 מאת ‪Laurence Marks‬ 
<‪l-ma...@northwestern.edu‬>:‬
     With such large RMT you certainly need HDLO for Nd, perhaps both d & f. I 
would not want to use such large RMTs.

Have you checked that the charge convergence is good? 

_____
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has 
thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 03:04 Victor Zenou <za...@post.bgu.ac.il wrote:
     Hi
Here is updated question:

Dear Wien2k users

I'm using wien2k version 17.1 installed on Ubunto 18.04.

I need to calculate the enthalpy of formation of few intermetallic phases that 
include Nd. For that element I used RMT=2.7 a.u. and RMT*Kmax=8.5 for
spin-polarization calculations via GGA-PBE. I didn't try spin-orbit coupling. 
Yet.

The first stage is to choose proper k-points, which will give accurate results 
(I used 1x10^-4 Ryd for energy convergence) on one hand, but on the
other hand won't be expensive in terms of computing time.

I noticed that there are large energy fluctuations (1x10^-2 Ryd; which are 2 
order of magnitude higher than the energy accuracy (defined by
convergence criterion), even when I went to 15,000 k-points. Here is a list of 
energy as function of k-points:

K-points          IBZ      E [Ryd]

 100       8        -77040.4692

 500     38        -77040.4780

1000    81        -77040.5062

2000    120      -77040.5061

3000    208      -77040.4391

4000    244      -77040.4699

5000    280      -77040.4878

7500    455      -77040.4707

10000  540      -77040.4881

15000  840      -77040.4694

 

I would be happy to get an idea what could have gone wrong.

Best regards, Victor



‫בתאריך יום ד׳, 16 בינו׳ 2019 ב-13:59 מאת ‪Victor Zenou‬ 
<‪za...@post.bgu.ac.il‬>:‬

     Dear Wien2k users

     I'm using wien2k version 17.1 installed on Ubunto 18.04.

     As a part of investigation of intermetallic phases in Al-Ti-Nd system, I 
need to calculate the enthalpy of formation of few phases in
     that system. For that purpose, I start calculating enthalpy (equal to 
energy at 0K) for each element and phase at their optimal relaxed
     state.  I used spin-polarization calculations. (GGA-PBE) As advised in 
Wien2k website I used the same RMT for each elements: 2.3, 2.5
     and 2.7 a.u. for Al, Ti and Nd, respectively. Also proper RMT*Kmax (7.5 to 
Ti, 8.5 to Nd and 7.0 for the rest).

     The first stage is to choose proper k-points, which give you accurate 
results (I used 1x10^-4 Ryd for energy convergence) on one hand,
     but also some save computing time.

     The calculation for all elements and phases went OK, but Nd. From certain 
k-points the energy fluctuated between 2 values (differed by
     1x10^-2). Attach a list of energy as function of k-points:

     K-points          IBZ      E [Ryd]

      100       8        -77040.4692

      500     38        -77040.4780

     1000    81        -77040.5062

     2000    120      -77040.5061

     3000    208      -77040.4391

     4000    244      -77040.4699

     5000    280      -77040.4878

     7500    455      -77040.4707

     10000  540      -77040.4881

     15000  840      -77040.4694

      

     I tried to get smart and did volume optimization using 4000 k-points, 
later 5000 k-points. I got strange results.

     I would be happy to get an idea what could have gone wrong.

     I didn't try spin-orbit coupling

     Best regards, Victor  

      

      

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to