Forget kram at the moment.
Check case.joint if this file looks ok. It contains the unbroadened imag epsilon (eps2).
It should be zero up to the band gap, but increase afterwards.

Check the band ranges in case.scf2
You will see how far it reaches in energy above EF.

PS:   Hybrid DFT calculations:

Since hybrid DFT is expensive, it is VERY important to check convergence of various parameters, starting with SMALL parameters.

Eg. a scf calculation with 12x12x12 full k-mesh is almost certainly an overkill. If this is a semiconductor, I'd start with 4x4x4 and later check it.

There is a good reason that we offer the "reduced k-mesh" It saves a lot of time. Maybe for beginning a 2x2x2 mesh is fine as a start.

Number of bands: As L. Marks said: maybe the technical minimum NB+1 is missleading in the UG. This is certainly not converged. I would add start with adding 2-3 bands/atom in the unit cell. If you have 9 atoms/cell, add 20-30 bands at the beginning. ( This depends a lot on the type of atom. You should always add all empty orbitals of an atom (all d-orbitals of a TM atom, or all p for C or Si, P, S ....)

Once you have a result for optics, increase (double) these parameters and check how much the optics has changed.

Am 07.03.2021 um 21:53 schrieb pboulet:

ok, I can try with more bands. 50 bands correspond to NB+5, which is probably 
not enough (I am not sure how many is ‘many’ for optics). As I understand, 
optics with hybrids seems beyond what is feasible even with supercomputers…
But increasing the number of bands may not solve the problem I noticed about the 
"forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error, unit 10, file 
Cu3SbS4_nb50_k121212.joint" with kram.

Thank you
Best,
Pascal


Le 7 mars 2021 à 20:25, Peter Blaha <pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at> a écrit :

Are you sure you have enough bands in the HF calculation ?
For a compound   Cu3SbS4  nb=50 looks very small.

You probably need even for the scf run more than NB+1 bands (this is formally 
enough, but results are not converged), and for optics you need MANY unoccupied 
states !!!
Check case.in1 and case.inhf and case.inop.


--------------------------------------------
Betreff:
Re: [Wien] Running optics with hybrid functional
Von:
pboulet <pascal.bou...@univ-amu.fr>
Datum:
07.03.2021, 12:16
An:
A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>

Hello,

I am resuming the discussion on this topic as I have not solved the problem yet.
As Peter sait in his previous post, I did _not_ use x kgen but rather 
runkgenhf_lapw in all my calculations with HF.

The SCF procedure with HF looks clear to me in the manual. I am less 
comfortable with the x optic -hf procedure.

I recall that I have generated a mesh with 163 k-points in the IBZ (12x12x12). 
As it turns out, I can converge a HF SCF with this many k-point mesh, so I did 
it. This way I do not have to resort to redklist or newklist; I suppose it is 
not incorrect for further optics calculations…

Once the SCF had converged I ran the following sequence for the optical 
properties:
x lapw0 -grr -p
x lapw0 -p
x lapw1 -p -c
x lapw2 -p -c
x lcore
x hf -mode1 -p -c
x lapw2 -fermi -hf -p
x optic -hf -p
x joint -hf
x kram

Until x joint -hf -p, the calculations seem to go fine, although this may not 
be true in the sense of the resulting data (see Im(eps) and Re(eps) below).
But then there is a problem with x kram as I have an error message, which is:

opmat allocated with kkk,nemax1,ncol         163          51           2 (
           0  MB)
  SUM OF WEIGHTS:    2.00000000000001
JOINT DOS END
0.047u 0.172s 0:00.80 26.2%     0+0k 2280+464io 0pf+0w
forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error, unit 10, file 
/scratch/cnt0022/pmc6881/paboulet/WIEN2k/Cu3SbS4_nb50_k121212/Cu3SbS4_nb50_k121212.joint
forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error, unit 10, file 
/scratch/cnt0022/pmc6881/paboulet/WIEN2k/Cu3SbS4_nb50_k121212/Cu3SbS4_nb50_k121212.joint
Image              PC                Routine            Line        Source
kram               000000000040AE46  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
kram               0000000000425BA0  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
kram               0000000000403020  MAIN__                     83  kram.f
kram               0000000000402A9E  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
libc-2.17.so       00002B8821F76555  __libc_start_main     Unknown  Unknown
kram               00000000004029A9  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
0.001u 0.017s 0:00.21 4.7%      0+0k 1496+0io 0pf+0w
error: command   /scratch/cnt0022/pmc6881/paboulet/wien2k/19.2/kram kram.def   
failed


The joint file contains:
#  Energy  [eV]   Im(eps)xx      Im(eps)zz      Re(eps)xx
Re(eps)zz
#
     0.013606  -0.134882E-39  -0.104665E-39   0.100000E+01   0.100000E+01
     0.027211  -0.639539E-40  -0.496264E-40   0.100000E+01   0.100000E+01
     0.040817  -0.392533E-40  -0.304594E-40   0.100000E+01   0.100000E+01
…

There is a line break in the file between Re(eps)xx and Re(eps)zz. Is it normal?

Note also that I still get Im(eps)~0 and Re(eps)=1.0 irrespective of the 
energy, which is strange.


What could be the origin of these behaviours?

Thank you for your time and help,
Best regards,
Pascal




Am 07.03.2021 um 12:48 schrieb wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at:

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300             FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to