I agree that Z=40.0625 was not a good suggestion. Then Z=22.0675 is reasonable to simulate n-doped STO. Would it be possible to verify that the additional charge accumulates at the surface? If I recall correctly, STO is cubic. It could be that the symmetry will be broken to respond to the surface dipole?
Also, I have heard about core-hole calculations. Is it completely irrelevant here? Best regards Oleg ________________________________________ From: Wien <[email protected]> on behalf of Laurence Marks <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 10:35 To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Subject: Re: [Wien] Charged cell versus virtual atom? To clarify first: Nb-doped STO is commercial, with Nb on the Ti site doping the STO n-type -- Nb is 5+ valence versus 4+ for Ti. It is known that the carriers are delocalized. I am interested in the near-surface band bending, both clean and with a Shottky contact to Pt/Pd under force. This models some of the terms in the trbolectricity of a moving Shottky diode contact. (This is bare-bones details.) Band bending, but also energy (to get contact forces and bulk lattice) matter. While having Z=22.0675 is more like V doped, it does balance the charge. Charged cells have approximations for the total energy, and add a background potential, which raises issues in my mind for the vacuum & Pd/Pt. Simple approximations have ~80 total atoms, 25 unique; a more complete has ~700/190 for total/unique. To zero'th order the two look similar, but..... -- Professor Laurence Marks Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu> "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought" Albert Szent-Györgyi On Mon, May 2, 2022, 5:41 AM Fecher, Gerhard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Z=40.0625 means you replace all Ti by Zr + a little electrons, instead of Ti + 1/16 e-, isn't it ? I assume that changing the charge by epsilon e- works only for neighbouring elements, on top, if you rplace the Z of Ti (22) by 22+1=23 then you have fully V and not Ti+1/2 Cr, etc.. ==> supercell even if its vast (or some program that uses CPA to have a mean field behaviour). Ciao Gerhard DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy: "I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you have never actually known what the question is." ==================================== Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher Institut of Physics Johannes Gutenberg - University 55099 Mainz ________________________________________ Von: Wien [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] im Auftrag von Rubel, Oleg [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Gesendet: Montag, 2. Mai 2022 05:19 An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Betreff: Re: [Wien] Charged cell versus virtual atom? I must admit that I do not have any experience with the fractional Z, but it seems that the option (b) could be better. At least it has some chemical specificity. Maybe it is better to use Z=40.0625 to differentiate between Nb and V? Best regards Oleg ________________________________________ From: Wien <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Laurence Marks <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 16:59 To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Subject: [Wien] Charged cell versus virtual atom? As part of a larger problem, I need to simulate a Nb-doped SrTiO3 surface, where 1/16 Ti sites is Nb. To first order this is 1/16 extra electrons. There are two ways I can think of to do this: a) Charged cell calculation, with extra electrons + background charge. b) Virtual atom, where the Ti's have a Z of 22.0625. Does anyone have any experience with something similar? I can think of reasons why both have issues, e.g. the extra potential in the vacuum in a). N.B., doing a super-duper surface cell with 1/16 Ti changed is too vast. -- Professor Laurence Marks Department of Materials Science and Engineering Northwestern University http://www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu> "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Györgyi _______________________________________________ Wien mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!FNQ3FIeGQr3Ij92fpVrKpXhQN1rvZ1AbpXb3Bb42XFAQEUSzoTisg_tTNl66foiEU05oqQ$ SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!FNQ3FIeGQr3Ij92fpVrKpXhQN1rvZ1AbpXb3Bb42XFAQEUSzoTisg_tTNl66fohMrBW7XA$ _______________________________________________ Wien mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!FNQ3FIeGQr3Ij92fpVrKpXhQN1rvZ1AbpXb3Bb42XFAQEUSzoTisg_tTNl66foiEU05oqQ$ SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!FNQ3FIeGQr3Ij92fpVrKpXhQN1rvZ1AbpXb3Bb42XFAQEUSzoTisg_tTNl66fohMrBW7XA$ _______________________________________________ Wien mailing list [email protected] http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html
