I do not know if it would be large, but to compare them you need to use
compatible systems, and that includes Rmt
Pablo
________________________________
Dear Prof. Delamora,
Thank you for your reply. You are right that we should keep
Rmt (Li) to 1.66 for both cases. However, my question is whether such a small
difference in Rmt of 0.06 would influence total energy in a considerable way?
with regards,
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 at 06:30, delamora
<delam...@unam.mx<mailto:delam...@unam.mx>> wrote:
I would assume that if you want to compare these 2 systems in energy then you
need to use the same Rmt in both systems, and it would be with 1.66, otherwise
I assume that in the secont system (after Li extracction) the spheres will
overlap if 1.72 is used.
Now, if you have different # of atoms in each system then I cannot see how you
can compare these systems.
Pablo
________________________________
Dear Prof. Blaha,
In a lithium-based compound, I have Rmt(Li)=1.72 while after
extraction of 1-mole lithium the Rmt of the rest of the Li atoms becomes
Rmt(Li) = 1.66 , whether these two compounds are comparable for the calculation
of Li extraction voltage or I may need to fix both of them either at 1.72 or at
1.66?
Looking forward to your advice.
with regards,
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 21:35, shamik chakrabarti
<shamik15041...@gmail.com<mailto:shamik15041...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thank you, Sir. I understand.
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 21:18, Peter Blaha
<pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at>> wrote:
When these are 2 independent calculations, the RMT can differ and the
optimal choice should be taken for each compound.
If you want to compare total energies (or maybe partial charges), the
RMTs must be identical.
Am 22.05.2022 um 16:22 schrieb shamik chakrabarti:
> Dear Wien2k users,
>
> I have a basic question regarding Rmt. Whether the
> same element at different compounds can have different Rmt?
>
> Looking forward to hearing from you.
>
> with regards,
>
> --
> Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
> Research Fellow
> Department of Physics
> Indian Institute of Technology Patna
> Bihta-801103
> Patna
> Bihar, India
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
WIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW: http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India
--
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
--
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
